It’s no secret that fractions are a very difficult concept for students to understand. But why is that? Fractions are an extremely abstract concept, and without adequate concrete and representational experiences that build fraction number sense, students do not develop mental images of what the abstract symbols mean.

*This post contains affiliate links, which simply means that when you use my link and purchase a product, I receive a small commission. There is no additional cost to you, and I only link to books and products that I personally recommend.*

In Texas, students begin formal fraction instruction in 2nd grade under our TEKS, but the symbolic notation for fractions (1/4, 2/3, etc.) is not taught until 3rd grade. The 2nd grade standards include:

- partition objects into equal parts and name the parts, including halves, fourths, and eighths, using words
- explain that the more fractional parts used to make a whole, the smaller the part; and the fewer the fractional parts, the larger the part
- use concrete models to count fractional parts beyond one whole using words and recognize how many parts it takes to equal one whole

Let’s take a closer look at each.

### Partition into equal parts and name the parts

The most fundamental understanding about fractions is that the parts must be equal. Children have a basic understanding about equal parts prior to formal instruction on fractions. They know, for example, that when a sandwich is cut into two parts, the parts are called halves. We know they don’t fully understand fractions, however, because we often hear children say, *I want the bigger half.*

*halves*, three equal parts are called

*thirds*, four equal parts are called

*fourths*, and so on. The

*denominator*, then, is actually a noun—just like

*apple*or

*orange*.

### Count fractional parts using concrete models

*fourths*just like we can count

*apples.*For example, we can have 1, 2, 3, or 4 fourths. We can even have 5, 6, or 7 fourths, although that would be more than a whole. So the

*numerator*is a counting number.

*fourths*, it takes 4

*fourths*to make a whole. This leads students to understand that 3 fourths is less than a whole, while 5 fourths is greater than a whole. Notice that in 2nd grade, students are actually experiencing improper fractions and mixed numbers, although they are not formally identified as such.

Students should also see a variety of representations for fractions. In the pictures above, I’ve used foam __fraction circles__, but you can also use __Cuisenaire rods__, __fraction tiles__ or fractions strips. Click __here__ to download both color and B & W fraction strips.

### More parts = smaller pieces

Did you groan when you looked at the graphic above because you’ve had so many students tell you 1/8? That is such a common misconception. Without concrete and pictorial experiences *seeing* pieces of both sizes, students revert to what they know about whole numbers—a bigger number is bigger. Using that reasoning, 1/8 must be bigger, because 8 is greater than 4.

**lots**of concrete and pictorial experiences with fractions, then I’ve done my job. This is just so critical.

### Decomposing fractions

I’m a big fan of __number bonds__. The part/whole understanding students develop when they work with number bonds is an essential component of being able to work flexibly with numbers. Some time back, I wrote a blog post about how __number bonds evolve__ through more complicated math concepts, and fractions was one of the examples I used. In the example shown below, if students know they need 2 more fifths to make a whole and that they can get those 2 fifths by decomposing the 4 fifths, it sure makes improper fractions and mixed numbers a whole lot simpler. Typically, we teach procedures for adding fractions and converting the sum to a mixed number, and students often follow the steps with no real understanding. Worse yet, they add the denominators and end up with 7 tenths!

Students would, of course, experience this concept first with concrete materials, and it might look and sound something like this:

Then, I thought, why not develop number bond cards for fractions? And that’s exactly what you see pictured. The traditional __number bond card__ is on the left with the __fraction number bond card__ on the right.

Here’s the prep work…

If you know me, you know these fraction number bond cards are going to be hole-punched and put on O-rings! Don’t hole punch them with a single hole punch, though—use your 3-hole punch! It’s so much easier, and your holes line up nicely.

The finished product! I actually put the halves, thirds, and fourths on one O-ring and the sixths and eighths on another. Much more manageable that way.

Meaningful Practice

Students need lots of practice with this concept. And what makes practice engaging and meaningful? GAMES! The games shown here are from my Fractions: Composing and Decomposing Fractions with Number Bonds resource, which also includes the fraction number bond cards.

There are 24 cards like the ones shown that can be used to play either Memory or Go Fish. The goal is to find two cards that make a whole.

The card shows 1 eighth. I would ask my partner, “Do you have 7 eighths?”, because 1 eighth and 7 eighths make a whole. If they do, they hand it over and I lay down the pair. If they don’t, they say, “Go fish!”.

The other game is a Scoot game. Card 19 shows 4 sixths. It takes 2 more sixths to make a whole, so I’d write 2 sixths in space 19. It’s typically played whole class, but it’s also a great workstation.

I hope this post has provided you with some useful information! I’d love to hear your comments.

Another classic post! Since I stopped introducing the symbolic notation of fractions to second graders they have developed fewer misconceptions and are much less likely to use improper whole number reasoning as a third or fourth grader. I like to talk with older kids about the numerator being an adjective and the denominator being a noun.

Tara

The Math Maniac

Thanks, Tara! Yeap Ban Har talked about the “noun” and “adjective” thing when I saw him speak this summer. Such a great analogy! The standards writers definitely got this progression of skills right, IMO, and it’s a big improvement over how we have traditionally taught fractions.

Wow this is really interesting and will be really helpful even with the students who have been struggling with fractions. Thank you for posting!

Fantastic article, I found this so helpful. I currently teach first grade and they adore playing “Go Fish” to practise combinations of 10. The idea of adapting this game for fractions in later grades is something I will definitely be sharing at my team meeting. Thank you!

Love seeing number bonds applied to fractions! I’ve been playing with linear models of fractions as thinking of fractions on number lines are often challenging. I think I noticed on Twitter that you did some work for Shell Education. Great folks there! @Linda_Dacey

Hi Donna,

In the US, are you required to familiarise your students with unit fractions only, or do you have to show them fractions of a collection of objects too?

Here in Aus we have to do both from the beginning, but starting with halves, then quarters etc… The kids find unit fractions easy, but the fractions of collections hard to work out independently.

Do you think students should be well acquainted with unit fractions before going on to fractions of collections?

Ali

If I’m not mistaken, Common Core only mentions parts of a whole and number lines but, of course, there are other standards used throughout the US as well. In Texas, our standards start with parts of a whole in 2nd grade, and really hit fractions hard in 3rd. Fractions of sets are not mentioned at all, but the number line is much more prominently featured than it used to be.